21/04/2011

Letters

Van Gogh's Letter
At the moment I’m reading a Van Gogh's biography, which has a detailed account of his life, thanks to the extensive letters Vincent would write to Theo - his ever patient and loyal brother. At some point of Vincent’s life, in his late thirties he moves to Paris, with Theo. The biographer’s frustration is almost palpable, because the brothers are living together and therefore, there’s no point in exchanging letters, so at the end of the day the biographer has no material to work with. Of course the biographer uses other sources, but there’s no psychological depiction of the painter, the source is cold and factual. There’s no passion, and as a reader I feel the account is one-dimensional – actually, I’m anxious to go on reading, to the later days when Vincent is not sharing the flat with Theo, so the narration gets more detailed and enthusiastic. Of course, Vincent’s (amazing) drawings and (breath taking) pictures illustrate part of his life, at least life as he saw and felt it. But the reasoning, the heartache, the vision that’s all in his excruciatingly detailed letters to Theo and some other people who, luckily for us and art students all over the world, have kept the letters. It seems intriguing to me that Theo would save all the letters, for a lifetime.
And yet…

In my tiny hall there’s a Chinese chest, half filled with letters I’ve received in the last 20 years. Even though the letters only tell half the story, similarly to what happens with Vincent, it tells my story: the people I’ve met, the places I’ve been, the experiences I’ve shared, the lessons I’ve learned. And around the world, if people have kept my letters and postcards, the other half of my story is scattered around. More, I feel that whenever I mail a letter (not an email, a letter of the old fashioned kind: on paper and written with a fountain pen) I’m chopping bits and pieces of my soul and sending them away. Something like “I’ve given birth to you , I’ve raised you and now you’re ready to depart and face the world. Off you go!”. However, the moment I mail the letter, I forget its contents. I’ll remember of course what was it about, but I cannot remember specifics. So, in the end, I’m left with an unfinished version of my story.

Last year, of one my oldest and dearest friends turned 32 and I thought it would be funny for him to read the letters he wrote me when he was 16. I wrapped them and gave him as a birthday present. He was genuinely happy – he had been thinking for some years now, to organize his letters (the ones written to him). But then he felt there was not really a point, because it would be putting up together a dialogue with only one speaker. Now he had a chance to have the entire story, the dialogue of two voices, a bit of History – his story.

19/04/2011

Weather

Weather is the ultimate ice-breaker. Anyone who has been in an awkwardly long elevator ride, or in a taxi Lisbon, knows what I'm writing about. However, there's an art to this whole "weather ice-breaking method". A good conversationalist will tell you that commenting on the weather alone, or complaining about it, it's not really a weather conversation - that's just chit chat.  If you want to use weather to break the ice, and eventually lead to a more meaningful talk, there are three very successful approaches to it:

a) the environmental approach: first you comment on the weather, stating whether it's cold, warm, rainy, etc. And then just go about telling how it used to be "in the old days", and that maybe all that talk on the icecaps melting away in the poles, and ice ages, makes sense. If you are comfortable on this theme, you should quote sources, this may lead to a talk on media today, how books are expensive, and so forth. If by any chance  you quote Al Gore, than you are safe. From Al Gore you can go to American politics, elections, politics in your own country, TED Talks and a myriad of other different and totally unrelated themes.

b) the housewife approach: if the person you're talking to is also a housewife, you'll be on safe land imediately. Just comment on how the weather is helping/hindering your household tasks: laundry, changing winter clothes to summer clothes, how the gas/electricity bill is higher this time of the year. Once you mention your electricity bill, you're opening the door to a wider range of subjects: inflation, natural resources (environmental approach is on the brink here), and politics once again. A poor conversationalist will stick to exchanging housework tips, this is convenient if you are in the lift, the rides are usually short.

c) the medical approach: comment on how the weather is affecting your good health: "ah this heat makes my legs swell". If you're Portuguese, you'll have a LOT to talk about, besides you have to make a point on how the weather is worse for you than for other people, and this alone should keep you quite busy. If not, just bring about in the conversation the last time you went to the doctor, and you'll find that the person who you're talking to has his/her own rant against the national health system or insurance companies. The medical approach will leave you busy for several hours. This approach is recommended on chemists', post offices' or hospital's queues.

It seems that even in blogs, that are written monologues, weather can give you a hand to get started. :-)

Namaste!